With the current strike in Madrid Metro , described as "wild" because the unions have decided to make it real and not made up with the hackneyed minimum services have raised many interesting questions, not only on the right to strike, but also on the current situation and the future comes.
I will take advantage of several very lucid comments I've read in Pool, the provisional forum in which we have taken refuge for the duration of illness of Unofficial Student Forum:
First a brief explanation of why the conflict timely posted:
Union Convenes Drivers, CCOO, UGT, Solidaridad Obrera, Free Trade Union Station and not just the drivers.
claim: that they are not applying the 5% cut (to them from the 2.15%) which gives the Assembly in Madrid on Monday for all Public Works CAM as control days ago the Central government.
underlying: In what is an unlawful, Metro de Madrid is a company with its own convention outside the civil service agreements, not civil servants.
The central government decree separate left to commercial companies, but the government of CAM and its railways Valencia and here at Metro have included against the law. If you want renegotiate their salaries, they should renegotiate their own agreement and not put them in the group of civil servants which do not belong.
Other corporations are: Renfe, ADIF and Aena, EMT ... which obviously are not included within this 5% cut.
In an interesting discussion on a review of current laws forthrightness overwhelming:
far as I know, public Metro employees are not civil servants, but servants of the CAM. The president of the CAM is not eligible for the state's 5% down pay officials to save a pinch of CAM presupueto going against the collective agreement. With that came down a 10% to senior would save twice the money.
And yes, your theory of law is flawless, only the mistake of confusing the law with justice. But nothing happens, is something sadly common in this country.
fuck We all strikes, but at no time in recent history of this country has been as justified as now. What you should do is join it: if I can not go to my job for a transport strike, I stay home and do not produce. And so on. Paralyze the country in three days, three days off work, three days without eating, three days with the lights out, without TV, without buying newspapers. And would see how quickly sat the mierdaempresarios mierdopolíticos and to negotiate and compromise.
A lucid and sharp commentary that puts the finger directly on the sore.
Enough of teasing. Here on the grounds of the crisis are taking to cut rights, we all know that will not go back to smell when the crisis passes. A central and regional governments do not shake your pulse to be making drastic cuts in wages, labor reforms to get cheaper out firing. It is seen that the fault that has stood out is that expensive to fire. The rising unemployment that affects only a very brutal way to Spain and that this may be due to the crisis before a quarter of temporary contracts in the EU were signed in Spain, is not an option considered by the phonies who govern us:
A comprehensive study conducted by the school timing ESADE Business concluded that no economic calculation nor the sectoral composition of the English production explain the abuse of temporary work, which is justified only in "the usual corporate culture." Does anyone believe that going to lower rates of temporary after the last reform of the socialist government (socialist me laugh)? I do not.
A growing number of wealthy, but you have to rescue banks and then reduce the deficit caused and the difficulties in finding financing that causes it (obviously, the credit becomes more expensive if you start to dedicate resources to bail out banks) by reducing wages, despite having an agreement in place that will forbid.
The rich take their money to Switzerland, and our Government, so short of funds, not only does not move a finger, but when France puts us in front of their noses the list of those thieves, and you can not keep looking Moreover, they are concealed, and asked politely to please, if you do not mind, then pay a little of what we have been. Of course, without taking names, without investigating anything more, without bringing them to justice, lest he be angry and you do not help politicians to keep their small piece.
If you really come tax cuts for the real economic situation, and not a short-term political decision, it would suffice to set up a blockade to Switzerland as the one we have mounted to Cuba (which to me is a country unless it hurts me Swiss banking secrecy) or to bribe three or four of these banks to take out a few hundred or thousands of names. You catch these thieves, I return what have been, or are embargoed until underpants. And if to do that is to change laws or the Constitution, it is, period.
But so far it is further crushed to a dormant company, and already high, putting against those who fight for their rights, so that tomorrow, solidarity among Scoundrels conspicuous by its absence. For me
not count. Today tomorrow for you and me. I have to leave an hour before my house to go to work, and go uncomfortable, but I will not crap on anyone but ZP and Hope are to blame. In my course not tease me.
A very illustrative vignette
What they want is for us and insulted us not look up.
Another summary with the knife between his teeth:
To see if the rock is full:
1) Metro workers are not civil.
2) What is claimed that compliance with the collective agreement
3) It is ILLEGAL to lowering their wages, while under the agreement. Or 5%, or 50, or 1%
4) The minimum services are governed by laws before the Constitution was set unilaterally by the authority, has never developed a law to strike. What is the point that the authority which sets the minimum service? Therefore they are always abusive
5) One of the goals of a strike is to achieve impact, minimum services only serve to not notice the strike, so it's Drawer putting the wildcat strike to strike domesticated.
6) When we go wrong, we all want people to understand us. When I go wrong Metro workers are bastards. When the Civil breaks the law, all welcome. When rescue the bankers, do the wave. When a worker fighting for the bread of your children is a bum.
7) A cool that we all meet our agreement on our gigs, have 30 holidays, wages set by law, for matters within days and a series of rights. Will we be cool it would break all illegally?
8) Maybe we have the crisis that we deserve, all entrepreneur minded and toady. If we took all of example of Metro workers, we would sing a different story. They are an example of dignity, the other a climb and unsupportive.
9) The scabs who say they want to work and that the pickets are intimidated, certainly when strikers get their rights they give up, right?
10) is true, there are more important. "Navas and Fernando Torres will play this afternoon? All the Red morning and passed to stop mourn the corners
seems we all agree, right?
completely agree with the mentality of this country that has led to a state of subservience to a group, the business This produced a steady decline in the purchasing power of the working class.
The truth is that I can not understand how people defend the positions employers as if they have shares in these companies ...... live to see ... and showing that I come by public transport and so today I sense of discomfort as the rest but is not it worse discomfort take away rights that day in and day out?
an exchange of views between two foreros in which reappears hackneyed argument against the unions and really enlightening response:
One wrote:
one thing I do not understand, and is of Customize This strike in Esperanza Aguirre.
... I know that the English trade unions are a branch of government, but do not be a strike against government measures NATION imposed on the Community of Madrid?
On the other hand, if I understand the situation, then the argument does not understand "how to skip the convention, we are entitled to skip the law and not to provide minimum services." If my knowledge of law have not been too outdated, I understand that the priority of sources of law is above the LAW of the Convention, and that an agreement can not contravene any provision of law, as in this case. Therefore, I again assume that rape the bill comes just one of the two sides of the conflict. Take into account when you arrive, deserved if my argument is flawed, dismissal or disciplinary sanctions from those public servants who decided to stop completely the provision of a public service.
And the answer:
Esperanza Aguirre, apart from that is not under the Royal Decree 8 / 2010 to cut the salaries of workers in the Metro, which is holding the unions and about which I have not heard any politician speak, imposed minimum services that clearly undermine the right to strike., recognized in the Constitution reigns supreme and takes precedence over any rule Statutory. Nothing new, you know how in the past violated in PP Urdaci transmitter making the party in TVE.
The English Constitution does not contain a single article that proclaims the indissoluble unity of Spain, as our politicians seem to believe (and here I put the PP and PSOE, whose leaders, surprise surprise, have sided with their fellow guild in this strike).
If the government violates a fundamental right, obviously the top strikers will not support measures unconstitutional, so does strike without minimum services. Esperanza services intended to carry minimum to the courts, so that within a year to give them the right to trade unions, without any effect. That is called fraud, also recognized in our legislation.
In addition, Hope has always proclaimed a fervent liberal (again, I laugh.) I doubt it intends to rely on a privilege illiberal as that of the self governance of public administration to impose its will. More so when Esperanza Aguirre launched a civil disobedience movement against the VAT hike, so once again, is that basically joined by many things from the unions. You only need to be consistent with its alleged liberal ideas, to respect the attitude of trade unions to rebel against the despotic public power.
And the unions are in favor of the PSOE and such and such, have organized a strike held a few weeks ago and have organized a general strike against the government of the PSOE. So I do not know where you see the PSOE and subservience to the political background to the strike against the government in Madrid.
'm sure the debate continues, but so far has come up here. In the current situation is being used by many sectors of power, the excuse of the crisis to end historic rights of the working class and is something that is not acceptable. The mass is alienated without reacting to the cuts, we have sought the death of ideology, the discrediting of lapolítica from within the political class, the destruction of all the ideals of the left since the wall fell slowly to get what they're getting, that we stepped on to the streets that we conform to the cuts.
And no, we must fight, for ourselves and for those who come later, because now is the so-called relaxation of dismissal, wage cuts, increased retirement age ... And the rest will come back. Ideal for business productivity and competitiveness are the Chinese, it means working 18 hours, seven days a week for a bowl of rice. And that is not admissible.
0 comments:
Post a Comment